another 9 1 2 weeks what happened to elizabeth
dark dirge of a moving-picture show - and that's the practiced part
The original 9 1/2 weeks was a fun and sexy film that was full of life. Another 9 one/2 Weeks is nigh the exact opposite of the outset film and that's why so many fans of the first moving-picture show were and so unhappy with this ane. This ain't ix 1/2 Weeks. In this one the character of John is so devastated by the loss of Elizabeth (his lover from the first film) that in the opening moments he places a gun to his head. Information technology doesn't get any happier from in that location. A few scenes later on he looks out his window and sees a once cute equus caballus beingness turned into a dead one. That pretty much describes the state of John and of this sequel. It's a dark chant of a moving picture with none of the joy of the showtime film and that'south the whole point. We see John with sexual partners, including a prostitute he tries to pretend is Elizabeth, but there'south aught chemistry even with the motion picture's lead actress Angie Everhart. Elizabeth divergence has left a void in John's soul and few know the nighttime places of a man's soul like Mickey Rourke. Just have a wait at his functioning in Angel Heart if you have any doubts. This time Rourke's face has go then battered from boxing that his appearance fits his character's emotional devastation perfectly and this is underscored by the pic's black and blue cinematography. Rourke's John truly seems to exist a man who has lost everything as he wanders from the art galleries to the night alleys of Paris like a ghost searching for some glimpse of redemption. It's not a pretty picture and it's non supposed to be. This is film about pain, loss, and regret. It's a joyless purgatory of a picture show which works best every bit a canvas for Rourke's haunting performance as the devastated John. This is not ix 1/2 Weeks. This sequel is dour, nighttime, and tragic. That's what I like nigh it.
39 out of 43 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
wouldn't exist that bad if information technology weren't and then damn dark!
Let me start with the good points: the movie is on a high quality print, the fine art direction is lovely, the sets are sumptuous, the exteriors are shot in Paris and the French countryside (how bad tin you screw that up)
And that's about it. The unabridged movie is shot in a corny blue lighting scheme, and most of the sets are as well blue. Given the presence of such a beautiful woman, Miss Everhart, and given that she did some rare-for-her topless scenes, some clearer lighting might take been sexier.
Talk near a lack of Chemistry between leads. These two never seem to similar each other at whatever time.
Rourke looks meliorate suited to do a sequel to Affections Heart than 9 1/ii Weeks. He'southward aging ... gracelessly. He looks like a ventriloquist's dummy that recently had his hair refitted. Despite his physical appearance, Rourke gives information technology his best shot, and he's pretty constructive as a man locked inside himself, tortured by past mistakes and chances never taken. This could have been very effective contrary Kate Blanchett or Emma Thompson or Gwyneth, simply only seems to echo unnoticed off Everhart.
Miss Everhart is a presence. Unfortunately, sound developed before color, and at that place were never any silent color movies, which would take been perfect for her.
She has a magnificent concrete aura, at five'11", with the mane of hair, the supermodel looks, and the ability to make full out a sweater with extraordinary curves. But the girl went to the Royal Kathy Ireland Academy of Dramatic Arts. In terms of depth, she makes Pam Anderson seem like Soren Kirkegaard. She delivers every line with the chirpy intonations of a high schoolhouse cheerleader. Surely at that place is more to her than this? What possessed someone to cast her in this office equally a successful and powerful career woman?
Well, what else is there to say about a pseudo-arty piece of erotica that isn't erotic? Missing the right leads, and missing any chemical science between them ... what else could redeem the movie? Plot? You want plot? Perchance you should try to re-watch Sleuth instead of renting this movie.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Non every bit terrible every bit virtually have made information technology out to be.
htbt 4 January 2007
Get-go off I LOVED the original 9 ane/2 weeks, let me remind yous that this motion picture was previously close to three hours long and very faithful to the book (at to the lowest degree that is what I have read) plainly test audiences felt it was as well agonizing so the director, Adrien Lyne was forced to cut A lot of parts. this is why the picture show looks disjointed - if you haven't noticed, the editing was pretty bad. I even read the Mickey Rourke had wanted Lyne to stick to his guns and let the moving picture stay faithful to the book.
if you haven't read the book still.. PICK It upwards - its by far the best erotic novel I've always read, its brusk and to the indicate.. apparently it is based on a truthful story - and so it intrigues me fifty-fifty more than.
dorsum to my review on this sequel, lets face information technology folks well-nigh sequels are e'er bad.. its hard to brand a great sequel period. when I get-go heard that there is a sequel to this film I was in shock - I felt that they should leave the story lone. but many of us who accept watched the original have ofttimes wondered what became of the two protagonist... this sequel takes united states of america there.
the biggest plough off was Angie Everhart'due south acting... yes she is gorgeous (not every bit gorgeous as Kim Basinger in my stance) but looks only go and then far - she was merely eye candy, watching her scenes was painful.
Mickey was not bad as the tortured John. I concur with another reviewer that the filmmakers made a wise choice to starting time the sequel where the original left off. I'm sure others would have liked john to move on - but that sometimes isn't reality. In theory the story was good, it just wasn't executed that well.
I really felt deeply sad for him and the fact that he could non be with the i adult female he loved - even when confronted with gorgeous women - its just not the same chemistry every bit he had with liz. I like the fact that elizabeth liked the games John played without having to tell him directly - she was almost similar a kid - which John liked. whereas lea wanted john to play with her sooo bad - it seemed pathetic.
anywho.. the interim on everhearts part made the movie bad for me... overall the moving-picture show wasn't that bad. I think near audiences are use to the typical films which Hollywood feeds us with, this one was different. Information technology was extremely sorry and painful - a love story and then intense and and so amazing, i in which its main protagonist has to move on with his life knowing that he will never be with the beloved of his life always again.
18 out of 19 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
saddest love story ever
I rented this 1 thinking it might exist an entertaining bit of tawdry trash with some inexpensive thrills. It is. It is also one of the saddest love stories ever. I can't say I "enjoyed" Some other 9 1/2 Weeks, merely I can say that I beloved the motion picture's romantic streak. It's a terribly sad romantic streak, merely a not bad romantic streak all the same. Another 9 1/2 weeks is too cheesy and trashy. It's cheesier and trashier bits actually work to the moving-picture show'southward reward past adding much needed levity to a very tragic story. Some take said the filmmakers should have had Mickey Rouke's character move on later on losing his great beloved, but that would have macerated the ability of their connection. He tin can't just movement on. She's gone and he tin't modify that. There's no way out from his torturous pain. Mickey Rourke makes you lot believe information technology. The filmmakers were smart in building their entire film around him. He truly seems like he's been through Hell. His graphic symbol begins the film in tremendous pain and ends the film in tremendous pain. At that place's no happy catastrophe (although I like to imagine he changed his name to Marv and moved to Sin City). Another 9 1/2 Weeks isn't an easy movie to enjoy. Very few beloved it, but I do. I rented it, watched it, and then I bought it.
31 out of 44 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love and Paris not bad
Surprise! I really liked dear in Paris. I call up it was much darker than the first one, but I respect the writers ideas and can see where they were going with it. What alot of people don't know is Mickey was disfigured from boxing when the movie was fabricated. And he still hasn't fully recovered yet. It took guts to go on filming in such a superficial business organization. But he always shows his fearlessness, and that makes him a great actor. And Everhart wasn't bad. She's a skillful actress and tin simply grow as long every bit she continues to believe in herself. The scenes betwixt John and Lea said merely what they needed to say. Use your imagination and feel John and Lea's hurting! This darkly romantic picture made sense as it showcased John'south disability to love over again. Sorry, but there is someone who did enjoy this motion-picture show.
30 out of 41 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mmm...I think I'm in love!!!!!
Now how would Barry White say this...most likely in a deep, suave, smooth, many vocalism..."Oh baby!" That'southward what I think of this love moving picture. Beginning off, it takes place in Paris, French republic, in Europe. Of course, we all know that Europe IS the role of the world to...well, parents may show this good advice of giving "x"south to their children, so I'll continue it appropriate. But at least I tin say that Paris is the city of lights; the city to fall in dear with; the city of romance! And that's exactly what happens - where else - in "Love in Paris!" At present, one more thing: of course, I'grand a guy for action. And then why am I here reviewing a "chick movie?" Because of the many ladies I can observe in this movie, that's what! And that'south why I am giving this motion-picture show a x.
21 out of 42 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well, well, well, I don't think I can deal with another 9 1/ii weeks of this!
9 1/2 Weeks is 1 of the sexiest films you will ever see, if y'all haven't seen information technology, go rent it now! I have to acknowledge that I love that film, it's such a guilty pleasure. But when I constitute the sequel to information technology, called Another 9 one/2 Weeks, I grabbed the movie without hesitation. I went home and watched it immediately, and I accept to say I tin can encounter why Kim didn't want to be in this film. And Mickey, Mickey, Mickey, he's not and so fine any more, he'due south more than merely very creepy and scary looking. The story didn't work and was just plain unnecessary, at to the lowest degree I didn't purchase information technology. I mean, x years and John still hasn't moved on? May I just recommend therapy? Though he and Lea had pretty good chemistry, information technology wasn't as sizzling as what John and Elizabeth had.
John is in Paris, he is about to come up to an art evidence where Elizabeth's paintings are almost to go on sale, John buys all the paintings hoping he'll bump into her. But alas, she isn't there, simply he notices a cute young woman wearing the shawl he gave Elizbeth, he asks her where she got it and she says Elizabeth gave it to her and they were best friends. The immature woman, Lea, is fascinated with the infamous John that rocked her friend'due south world, but John is just more concerned with speaking to Elizabeth, but when he gets terrible news, he may simply have to settle for the sexy best friend.
Some scenes were just too agonizing and unrealistic to how a person would react. John became likewise whiny and such a pansy boy. The passion wasn't very potent and the story was just horrible. I really recommend that yous stay away from this movie, but please see the starting time 9 1/2 Weeks, it's a great thriller, don't lookout this one, it'south simply plain insulting.
1/ten
10 out of 22 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Nigh Unerotic Erotic Moving picture Always Made?
Some other 9 i/2 Weeks (1997)
1/two (out of 4)
What on Earth were they thinking? John Grey (Mickey Rourke) travels to Paris to endeavor and track down Elizabeth but after learning that she'due south at present married he starts up a human relationship with a immature fashion designer (Angie Everhart). I think ix ane/2 weeks in hell would exist much more pleasant that trying to sit down through this film. It has one of the worst reputations in the history of sequels and information technology'southward easy to run across why. It would be like trying to make a Friday THE 13TH flick but instead of violence, gore and Jason you threw in singing, adept vibes and Barney the dinosaur. I'yard really not certain what the producers were thinking just this here is perhaps the most unerotic erotic movie ever fabricated. They clearly were just wanted to cash in on the notoriety of the first motion-picture show and I sympathize that. I'm fine that they were simply wanting to make coin simply for the life of me why would they deliver something like this? There's very footling sex, petty nudity and there'due south aught erotic that happens. The majority of the overbearing 105-infinitesimal running time features the two stars merely going into various clubs and getting in trouble. They flirt, they talk, they talk some more than and and so they become home to do nil. Manager Anne Goursaud might have been given an impossible task simply she didn't help matters whatsoever. The pacing of the film is downright horrid, the lack of manner just fabricated for an ugly mess and I'm really not sure why she decided to make everything so nighttime. The entire film just seems like a bad nightmare that you can't wake upwardly from and this includes the two leads. Rourke and Everhart have zero chemistry together and Rourke appears bored out of his listen and wishing he was anywhere but in front of the photographic camera. ANOTHER 9 one/2 WEEKS is a really bad movie on all levels and it'due south even poor when compared to much of the directly-to-Cinemax trash that was making the rounds during this period.
4 out of 7 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Requires a New Rating: 0
nine 1/2 Weeks, the predecessor, wasn't much but it was a masterpiece compared to this pic, which is incoherent, unerotic and much too long. In other words, a colossal bore on every count. I never did recall much of Mickey Rourke equally an actor but he had a certain magnetism when he was young. In this movie, he looks like a prodigal wreck and he never exhibits whatever attractive characteristics that would explicate the behavior of the immature women that throw themselves in his subversive path. In the version I saw it was called, not Honey in Paris, but Another 9 i/2 Weeks, and information technology seemed more similar Another ix-1/2 Years.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A motion picture for people who like the plots in porno films but don't necessarily desire all that nudity!
Warning: Spoilers
"Another nine ane/2 Weeks" has been on and off IMDb'southward Bottom 100 list for the last few years. It's on and off because it'due south nearly the bottom of the listing and occasionally other films knock it off...though eventually it seems to find its way back. Currently it'southward #99--and it being on the list is why I decided to watch this film. Although I take reviewed tons of art and foreign films, occasionally I like to come across a really, really bad moving-picture show--1 that is so bad that it gives me a good laugh. Well, I must say that "Another 9 1/ii Weeks" is terrible...but I didn't call back laughing even once. Information technology simply wasn't an enjoyable experience on any level.
I am sure that many tried watching this moving picture to see copious nudity. After all, that's what made the first 1 famous. However, despite Angie Everhart existence a very, very beautiful adult female, you never really see that much of her and so ofttimes parts of her are strategically subconscious. So what y'all are left with is like a balmy R or even PG-13 rated porn picture--with a plot that seems about the quality of a porno. And, I am pretty sure MOST people don't watch explicit films because of the great acting or circuitous plots!!
The pic picks up a few years after the first one. Mickey Rourke arrives in Paris and is trying to follow the trail of his old fling, Elizabeth. However, Kim Bassinger (Elizabeth in the kickoff film) wouldn't announced in this film, so you lot know he won't go his lady beloved. In the meantime, he meets one of her bizarro friends (Everhart) and she spends about of the film jerking Mickey around (and not in a good fashion). As for Mickey, he spends all his fourth dimension brooding and grunting. And, ultimately, you learn that Elizabeth was dead and this other woman knew this all forth. Does it audio romantic? Does information technology sound sexy? The plot is too sparse for most porn films. It rarely makes sense and is never interesting. Rourke generally grunts and Elizabeth behaves like a women who is off her meds. But the worst office about it is that it really isn't sexy. I really have no thought what they were thinking when they fabricated this i...merely it's pretty limp (double entendre intended) and not worth your time--even if y'all are a bad moving-picture show buff.
3 out of 7 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tacky, tasteless, and a full waste of time
In that location aren't enough words to describe what a disappointment this motion picture was. As a staunch fan of 9 i/two Weeks, I was dubious about a sequel, just even my low expectations couldn't match the reality of "Love in Paris".
Goose egg about the movie was reminiscent of the orignal. The role of John Gray seemed more pathetic than annihilation else. In addition to his "impotent" personality, was the fact that Mickey Rourke had gotten then out of shape that he was never allowed to have his shirt off. (Thank God)
Angie Everhart was truthful to form with her poor acting skills, and the plot was and then weak that several scenes were obvious and desperately revamped copies from the first pic.
The distressing office is that they couldn't even go the scarf correct. How difficult is it to find/make a scarf to look similar the original? This goes to prove that Beloved in Paris is Not a sequel. Information technology is a movie that must stand on its own, lest it tarnish the retention of that first and great film that it is loosely based upon. Trust me, if you experienced any blazon of titillation/attraction for the kickoff picture show/original characters...you exercise not desire to encounter Love in Paris. Not simply will you lot exist disappointed in information technology, only the images of a paunchy and washed-up Mickey Rourke will erase any pleasant memories of you have of charismatic John Gray.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rourke wasted over again
This film has got merely two things to offer:an aging Mickey Rourke and a good soundtrack.There is supposed to exist two main characters merely Angie Everhart does anything simply acting.Combining with the imperfection of the storyline,the failure to give her part a believable depth make the story look and then pretentious.However Beloved in Paris slightly survives thanks to the acting of Mickey Rourke.He gives a rememberable performance every bit John Gray who,after years,nevertheless lives in the past and is unable to forget Elisabeth - played by Kim Basinger in the start part.After his affair with Elisabeth,he is now a man bored of life and in the brink of a suicide who has zip to concur on till he finds out a way to alter his biggest fault.So he flies to Paris hoping for a new life.Except the potent performance from Rourke playing John Gray a human being who had turned out to exist a vulnerable romantic obsessed with the woman he let get from being the fantasy seeking player he had used to be,this movie has nothing else.No acting,no intelligence,no style - although at that place is a pocket-sized effort to form one - and most chiefly no intention to tell anything.Just some other case of wasting such a good actor.Just at least it can make yous think about the chances you lot missed,the misjudgments you did in your life.It certain made me practise.
12 out of 23 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If I were to draw this film in one word it would be "meh".
Alert: Spoilers
I didn't realize that this was a sequel until minutes before seeing it. I just constitute it on the bottom 100 list and decided to see it because of that, so my judgment is based solely on it'south own merits, without influence from the previous film.
I must say that I don't think it deserves a identify in the lesser 100, I actually liked the extremely dark, virtually suicidal tone in the offset simply about 35 minutes in, the whole movie shifts direction completely, becoming some kind of "Eyes broad shut" parody. I found myself asking "why is this happening?" over and again throughout the second act of the film simply at to the lowest degree something was going on. The last office of the film was just dreary, a drawn out sequence of nothing with dialog long winded leading nowhere, I was so shut to just skipping to the end. Love in Paris (or Another 9 and a one-half weeks) could have been good only ended up being totally and utterly meh.
3 out of 5 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sorry softcore nonsense
I'll admit, I still haven't seen the outset 9 1/ii WEEKS all the style through; it says something when this B-movie sequel is shown on Television more often than the first film! Still, information technology was a popular movie of the 1980s, and I'chiliad sure a lot better than this absolutely sorry attempt to ride the and so-popular wave of softcore movies clogging up cable Television in America in the mid to belatedly 1990s.
Where to brainstorm? Nix goes right with this flick, and it ends upwardly equally an amalgamation of terribleness. The script is horrible, the story overlong and nonsensical. This is a mood piece, then there'southward a lot of standing effectually, a lot of talking about null, a lot of leaning on walls. Director Anne Goursaud has a few similar movies in her filmography but this has to exist her worst.
Mickey Rourke returns from the original flick and his presence is an embarrassment. He looks weird, his face up altered by plastic surgery, so they try to hibernate him in the shadows for a lot of the fourth dimension. It doesn't hide the obvious. Angie Everhart gives a C-level performance, zero more, and isn't memorable at all. The film tries so difficult to be erotic, merely there are no sensual scenes and the attempts at them are excruciatingly embarrassing. In all honesty, I don't know what they were trying to do here except recapture the spirit of the original movie in some mode, but it doesn't work.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More than tits than last time
I really had the dubious experience of watching these movies in reverse, I saw Some other before I saw nine and honestly the difference is surprisingly glaring. Mickey Rouke takes center stage in this one. No longer the supporting character, he has become the focus. A man tortured past guilt is not a new plot betoken but information technology's a refreshing development for a character who was otherwise two dimensional. Thusly, it'south a welcomed change. Angie Everhart has an energy about her that'south exhilarant. She isn't but willing to pose nude, She owns her nudity. She is the playful one trying to lure Rourkes character out of his shell. Her motives remain questionable along with the fate of Elizabeth (the chick from the first movie). And the culmination of her motives is simplistic without feeling dumbed downward. The other two predominant characters, Angie'south assistant and concern partner, are both likable and they are suppose to be. And all 4 turn in performances that brand them memorable.
So how does it compare to the original? Some other is soft-core porn. It's a story virtually moving on from guilt or risking repeating your same mistakes. The mystery surrounding Angie's character draws you in every bit Rouke tries to unravel the mystery. And loads of gratuitous frontal nudity tucked in around the plot go along our attending.
9 on the other mitt is only a boring trudge through an unhealthy relationship where two people unrealistically expect something out of the other. Until finally it ends. Likewise no titties at all.
So in the end. You can sentry Another without seeing ix and not miss a thing. It's soft-core, simply with talented and nether appreciated actors delivering compelling performances, this is worth checking out at to the lowest degree one time. Plus naked Angie Everhart. 'Nuff Said
iv out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bo-o-o-o-ring
This film truly bored me. Roarke looks terrible, Angie Everhart'southward character went nowhere. The storyline is incomprehensible.
iv out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avert at all costs!
This is for whatsoever viewer that may go confronting their ameliorate judgment and watch this, 1: considering the showtime 1 is pretty decent for what information technology is, or 2: 'cause Angie Everhart is uniquely attractive. (Quick capsule side-track - less than 3% of the world'south XX-chromosomed inhabitants have naturally occurring blonde hair and redheads via genetic fusion will be gone by the yr 2100, say some geneticists). I am a member of the latter category (and the first one too, actually). Heed my warning, even if the hottest woman in the world was in this picture, it has no redeeming value whatever. It is an breathless mess of seemingly random scenes shot, and and then edited blindly together in an try to make a story of it, I don't remember an actual script exists. Children could brand a ameliorate film than this.
Do yourself a favor and tour the finish signs or traffic lights on foot in your local area rather than watching this abysmal turd of a movie.
iv out of nine found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'm all out of dear.
Warning: Spoilers
If not for the creamy Agathe de la Fontaine, this would be a wholly sad and laughable thing. There is something almost French girls with their full lips and flushed faces. Mickey Rourke increasingly creepy facial features don't make him the ideal romantic lead. Mix in a stolen plot directly from Last Tango In Paris and un-erotic direction from the person who brought us Embrace of the Vampire and Poison Ivy Two, and y'all have a movie that no i could love no affair where they live. My biggest describe dorsum is the miss utilise of Angie Everhart, ane of the few redheads in movies. She can play an icy fatale better than most, simply she is not and then good equally the girl looking for love, although she does expect good with rose petals and honey smeared on her. The original, directed by Adrian Lyne, is one of the better erotic fests with a more convincing atomic number 82 in Kim Basinger and a smoother faced Rourke.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awesome
Warning: Spoilers
Serious, getting to see Paris Hilton in the embarrassing positions she winds up in during this flick makes it all worthwhile. Seriously, who else deserves to have information technology in the confront and accept everyone see who'south got $17.99 to spare? Perhaps Nicole Ritchie, only Paris is the ultimate "I'one thousand famous cuz I'thou famous, but I'm really just a rich, talentless air-headed tramp" skank gets hers, at the hands (and photographic camera) of her ex-beau, and in various naughty positions to kicking. You volition not regret being witness to...um, wait, this isn't Ane Night in Paris? Oops. My bad.
*grin*
4 out of x found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
common cold Love in Paris
Water ice-cold picture that fails to engage the viewer, despite having loads of glamor, which is what RavenGlamDVDCollector is all about, so if I'thou not happy about it, something is seriously wrong. To the reviewer who said that Angie Everhart would take been cracking had it been a silent film, hell, you summed it upwards virtually eloquently! She looks like a thoroughbred racehorse, simply fails to emote any real feeling. Truthful, she is a classy- looking leading lady, but comes across equally non even lukewarm. Makes me wary of pursuing her other titles.
At the beginning of the movie at that place is this scene with a fantastically cute daughter, simply credited as 'cute blonde' (Philippa Mathews). However, John Gray isn't satisfied by her, and his attention wanders, he is distracted by a neighing cart-equus caballus that seems to have suffered a stroke outside in the street. The law arrive and they administrate a lethal injection to put the poor beast out of its misery. This is a metaphor for this entire movie.
Mickey Rourke isn't as bad as one of the reviewers made him out to be. Twelve years later, of form he'd be far less good-looking. Couldn't care much for the graphic symbol of John Gray though. Movie cried out for Kim Basinger, who was riding the crest of the moving ridge of L.A. CONFIDENTIAL at the time and couldn't be bothered, lucky for her. Or possibly Adrian Lynne might have been there had Kim been there? Anyway, a decent spark of real interest might have kickstarted this flimsy plot.
Jeesh, those hateful paintings! So Liz is supposed to have painted that dreck? With Vittorio as the model? Yuck! They're worth a few hundred dollars, and that'southward for the frames. Jeremiah the Bullfrog on a bad solar day is a much more pleasing sight. Heed, they obviously obtained the rights to turn with other people's horses, but they sure lead them astray. So Kim wasn't available, so Liz is dead?
Fashionable people are, I suppose, quite oftentimes merely coldly efficient. There is only a reptile heart there, I suppose. Which is what is wrong here. The way prove fails to be really exciting, it's all so damned cold, it looks good, but actually lacks warmth. Glamor with very little sexual activity appeal, or perhaps, sexual practice appeal with no real sexiness? Nothing playful. These observations have been very educational to me. I have pinpointed a coldness in likewise-fluently-executed perfection. RavenGLAM has learned of a flaw in beauty. Perchance over- confidence caused this coldness? Possibly super-common cold people hibernate behind visual excellence? Hell, Assist! This moving picture is ruining RavenGLAM!
Best thing of the movie: Cease credit (!!! No I didn't hateful it that way!!!) featuring Julienne Taylor. Why Did You Exercise It? Hauntingly beautiful. Words doesn't really fit in with the theme of the moving picture, so it is simply played at the cease. But wondrously good, a joy to hear.
Very poor sequel. Unsatisfactory. My rating of 3 is simply influenced by positively rewarding several glamorous scenes, the beauty, the limerick, the photography. I cannot allow myself to give it simply a one, which it truly doesn't fifty-fifty deserve. For what has been lost hither, is big.
In its defense, it hardly belongs on the Acme 100 Worst Movies. There are thousands of titles out at that place that fit that bill. Just if you bestow this honour equally a warning to future fools who dare to tread where angels backed off, then I quite understand, and just nod sagely.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absolutely the worst flick I have ever seen.
Oshun 26 Feb 1999
Idiotic plot, overdramatic "noir" events that do not shock, no chemical science betwixt the leads, a really annoying female person lead, wooden acting, from everyone, ho-hum "sexual activity", and poor Mr. Rourke bandage in a romantic atomic number 82 when he no longer looks the part. Just encounter the original again - information technology is much better, such equally it is.
four out of viii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantastic! Excellent picture to sentinel with your honey!
Great interesting plot, really dramatic "noir" events that do really shock, terrific chemical science between the leads, a really seductive female pb, brilliant acting, from everyone, steamy "sex", and a terrific Mr. Rourke cast in a romantic pb when other lesser actors would no longer look the office. The original was great, merely this one is meliorate! Encounter information technology over again, it just gets better, much meliorate, it is a classic, pure and simple.
It'south great! And very exciting! Watch information technology over and over to get the most out of information technology!
Mickey Roarke ever showed signs of greatness, and now we encounter why.
1 out of 2 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Get-go i was ok merely this is bad
Another ix and a half weeks too known equally love in Paris is drama movie directed by Anne Goursaud and starring Mickey Rourke, Agathe de La Fontaine and Angie Everhart.
The moving-picture show tells story (Apologies there is no story in the movie), of John who comes to Paris in search of his ex lover. Now the first function was non that cracking but this motion-picture show is garbage. The movie lacks basic storyline and screenplay. The direction also lacks depth.
As far as acting is concerned Rourke is a proficient actor just is completely wasted in the moving picture. Acting of supporting cast is either ok or beneath ok. The plot was good simply wasted due to bad execution.
A movie you lot tin avoid watching.
0 out of 0 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't watch this picture!
This is a very bad, worse and the worst flick! I don't like sequels almost and that is the worst of all. When the film was going on I wanted to cease information technology each minute. Don't sentinel this movie if you don't desire to feel bad. So great actor as Mickey Rourke had not to take part in that film.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119576/reviews
0 Response to "another 9 1 2 weeks what happened to elizabeth"
Post a Comment